Featured Image

Did DJIA Companies Report Higher Non-GAAP EPS in Q1'17?

Earnings

By John Butters  |  May 19, 2017

While all publicly traded U.S companies report EPS on a GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) basis, many U.S. companies also choose to report EPS on a non-GAAP basis. There are mixed opinions in the market about the use of non-GAAP EPS. Supporters of the practice argue that it provides the market with a more accurate picture of earnings from the day-to-day operations of companies, as items that companies deem to be one-time events or non-operating in nature are typically excluded from the non-GAAP EPS numbers. Critics of the practice argue that there is no industry-standard definition of non-GAAP EPS, and companies can take advantage of the lack of standards to exclude items (more often than not) that have a negative impact on earnings to boost non-GAAP EPS.

As of today, all of the companies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) have reported actual EPS for Q1 2017. What percentage of these companies reported non-GAAP EPS for Q1 2017? What was the average difference and median difference between non-GAAP EPS and GAAP EPS for companies in the DJIA for Q1 2017? How did these differences compare to recent quarters?

Quarterly Comparisons

For Q1 2017, 19 (or 63%) of the 30 companies in the DJIA reported non-GAAP EPS in addition to GAAP EPS for the first quarter. Of these 19 companies, 15 (or 79%) reported non-GAAP EPS that exceeded GAAP EPS. Over the past four quarters (Q1 2016–Q4 2016) on average, 68.3% of the companies in the DJIA reported non-GAAP EPS in addition to GAAP EPS, and 79.3% of these companies reported non-GAAP EPS that exceeded GAAP EPS.

Dow-Jones-companies-reporting-non-GAAP-EPS-2017

For Q1 2017, the average difference between non-GAAP EPS and GAAP EPS for all 19 companies was 53.6%, while the median difference between non-GAAP EPS and GAAP EPS for all 19 companies was 13.7%. Over the past four quarters, the average difference between non-GAAP EPS and GAAP EPS was 90.8%, while the median difference between non-GAAP EPS and GAAP EPS was 11.9%

Dow-Jones-Industrial-Average-companies-median-difference-percentage-Non-GAAP-EPS-versus-GAAP-EPS

Thus, slightly fewer companies in the DJIA reported non-GAAP EPS in Q1 2017 relative to the average of the past four quarters. However, the percentage of companies that reported non-GAAP EPS above GAAP EPS for Q1 2017 was consistent with the average over the past four quarters. The average difference between non-GAAP and GAAP EPS for Q1 2017 was below the average over the past four quarters, while the median difference between non-GAAP and GAAP EPS in Q1 2017 was above the median of the past four quarters

Company Highlights

Company Ticker Non-GAAP EPS GAAP EPS Difference
Visa Inc. Class A V 0.86 0.18 377.8%
Caterpillar Inc. CAT 1.28 0.32 300.0%
General Electric Company GE 0.21 0.10 110.0%
Coca-Cola Company KO 0.43 0.27 59.3%
Merck & Co., Inc. MRK 0.88 0.56 57.1%

 

Download the latest Earnings Insight

John Butters

Vice President, Senior Earnings Analyst

Mr. John Butters is Vice President and Senior Earnings Analyst at FactSet. His weekly research report, “Earnings Insight,” provides analysis and commentary on trends in corporate earnings data for the S&P 500 including revisions to estimates, year-over-year growth, performance relative to expectations, and valuations. He is a widely used source for the media and has appeared on CNBC, Fox Business News, and the Business News Network. In addition, he has been cited by numerous print and online publications such as The Wall Street Journal, The Financial Times, The New York Times, MarketWatch, and Yahoo! Finance. Mr. Butters has over 15 years of experience in the financial services industry. Prior to FactSet in January 2011, he worked for more than 10 years at Thomson Reuters (Thomson Financial), most recently as Director of U.S. Earnings Research (2007-2010).

Comments

The information contained in this article is not investment advice. FactSet does not endorse or recommend any investments and assumes no liability for any consequence relating directly or indirectly to any action or inaction taken based on the information contained in this article.