By Tom Abrams, CFA | April 22, 2021
Since the first Earth Day was celebrated in 1970, this annual event focusing on environmental protection has gone global. According to EARTHDAY.ORG, more than one billion people in 192 countries now participate in Earth Day activities each year. The Earth Day 2021 theme is Restore Our Earth, focusing on “natural processes, emerging green technologies, and innovative thinking that can restore the world’s ecosystems, as well as create a green jobs-ready workforce, a green consumer movement, and an educated and civically engaged citizenry around the world.”
While environmental efforts by corporations have been growing over the past few decades, in the last year expressions of environmental concerns have really taken off. An indicator of this is the growth in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting by companies and the rapid growth in investment funds with ESG mandates. In recent months, U.S. government agencies have begun to talk more about climate change and reflect it in policy choices; the same kinds of policy discussions and actions are happening globally. Below we discuss some of these corporate, domestic policy, and global trends in turn.
The growing corporate attention on ESG means that more studies are being done on the full life-cycle costs and greenhouse gas footprints of certain green efforts including ethanol, electric vehicles, cryptocurrencies, and even solar and wind generation. These studies should allow for smarter and more comprehensive rollouts of these technologies.
Numerous companies are beginning to reflect ESG metrics more directly in executive compensation. There have been some leadership changes on ESG grounds as well, with other companies pressed to make changes. While there continues to be management pushback where recommendations for change are viewed as too costly or disruptive, sentiment demanding ESG consideration has clearly picked up in recent quarters. FactSet data shows that, on average, 7% of S&P 500 companies mentioned “ESG” in their 2019 quarterly conference calls, a number that more than doubled to 15% in 2020. In the fourth quarter of 2020, 79 companies (25% of the S&P 500) cited “ESG” on earnings calls, the highest overall number of companies going back at least 10 years.
Each year, more firms are publishing Corporate Sustainability Reports (CSRs) to discuss emissions at their operations, their suppliers’ operations, and even at their customers’ operations; for some leading firms, 2020 and 2021 CSRs are their first reports. The Governance & Accountability Institute reports that 65% of the companies in the Russell 1000 published a CSR report in 2019. For smaller companies, only 39% published CSR reports.
From recent ESG summaries on FactSet’s StreetAccount, we highlight the following developments across the corporate world in the past year:
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced it will seek input on what companies should be required to report about greenhouse gas emissions and other climate factors. In addition, the SEC has created a taskforce to police public companies that fail to disclose material business risks stemming from climate change. That team will also review advisors and funds pitching sustainable products for "greenwashing," where firms may be using unsubstantiated or misleading information to suggest that their funds or products are more environmentally friendly than they are. At the same time, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission is creating a new “climate risk unit” that will focus on the role of complex derivatives in understanding and pricing climate-related hazards.
In February 2021, the Biden administration announced that federal agencies will be conducting regulatory and environmental analyses assuming a “social cost” of emitting carbon dioxide of $51/ton (Trump used $8, Obama used $51). $51/ton is between the $25 and $100/ton that many experts say reflects carbon’s negative impacts. Pushback on the announcement has come from industry groups and states whose economies rely on the industries most affected.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which in part regulates utilities and interstate pipelines, recently began including a consideration of greenhouse gas emissions in its project reviews. Now perhaps comes the hard part in the technical adoption of the new approach, a situation much like the debates around the adoption and application of ESG standards. Industry news source Natural Gas Intelligence highlights key items to watch at FERC, including how the commission defines what levels are permissible, how downstream emissions will be calculated, and what comes out of the process of public hearings and input on the issue.
Elsewhere in policy, the Federal Reserve has noted that “climate change is already imposing substantial economic costs" and so will create two climate committees to identify economic risks including systemic bank exposure. Biden’s infrastructure bill includes monies for capping old and abandoned oil and gas wells, reclaiming coal mines, adding EV charging stations, and investing in battery manufacture and metals.
As a final domestic item, President Biden put Vice President Harris in charge of revamping U.S. immigration policy. One of Harris’ goals will be to establish better relations with Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador, a policy that Biden campaigned on. We note this development because the reasons that have been offered as to why the immigration numbers are surging include poverty and violence but now also climate change.
At the United Nations (UN), 2021 is teeing up as an interesting year for the Paris Agreement on emission reductions, not least because the U.S. is rejoining the agreement. In 2015, member countries committed to emission reductions by 2030 to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees centigrade by the year 2100. Unfortunately, those 2015 commitments were far below the UN’s estimated trajectory of what was necessary to keep global warming to the 1.5 degrees centigrade target. Heading into a November 2021 climate summit, participating countries are being asked to improve their commitments to reduce emissions, and several of the larger emitters should be presenting their plans later in April ahead of the autumn meetings. So far, the countries offering revised plans have indicated only about a 3% faster decrease in emissions by 2030; the UN says this decrease needs to be 55% greater than the original 2015 plan.
Though we await new CO2e commitments to be put forth by many countries, we are seeing several governments making multi-billion-dollar announcements to address climate change, and a few are beginning to trade emission credits. For example, Europe’s carbon market has continued to firm in recent months, and some expect that power prices, reflecting those higher carbon prices, could be well above the forward curve there as regulations tighten and emitters scramble for carbon offsets. Many see carbon values either via trading or a carbon tax adding 10-20% to the cost of fuels. More firms are mentioning rising costs as a potential negative going forward; this could impact profits before inevitably being passed along to consumers. To create carbon offsets, several firms are investing in forest development with some investments located in Africa.
Interestingly, countries representing over half of global emissions have indicated zero-emission targets for 2050 (China 2060) so there may be some wrangling over the 2030 goals but with promises offered for a more stringent goal for 20 years out. Some large economies that have offered up 2050 net-zero goals have not said how they will get there, so there remains great interest in their plans. Meanwhile, the European Union (EU) is considering labeling natural gas as a transition fuel to enable the shift along the carbon continuum between coal and wind/solar. Some examples of proposals:
The path to Earth Day 2022 looks like it will be an active one! Rely on FactSet’s StreetAccount for relevant, real-time news summaries of ESG developments globally.
Mr. Tom Abrams is the Associate Director for deep sector content at FactSet. In this role, he is responsible for integrating additional energy data onto the FactSet workstation, including drilling, production, cost, regulatory, and price information. Prior, he spent over 30 years working at sell- and buy-side firms, most recently as the sell-side midstream analyst at Morgan Stanley. He also held positions at Columbia Management, Dreyfus, Credit Suisse First Boston, Oppenheimer, and Lord Abbett. Mr. Abrams earned an MBA from the Cornell Graduate School of Business and holds a BA in economics from Hamilton College. He is a CFA charterholder and holds certificates in ESG investing, sustainable investments, and real estate analysis.
Electric Utility Sector: Balancing AI-Driven Growth and Carbon Emission Challenges
The increasing energy demand driven by AI and data centers further strengthens the outlook for electricity utility companies.
By Jacqulin Kuk | ESG
Surveying the Cement Decarbonization Landscape
In this Insight we delve into the structure of the domestic cement industry, outline the energy use in cement production, and...
By Tom Abrams, CFA | ESG
22 Countries Pledge at COP28 to Triple Nuclear Power
The 28th annual United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP28) discussed nuclear energy as a potential solution for clean...
Aviation Decarbonization Awaits Engineering Solutions
Industry by industry in transportation, the considerations for decarbonization vary. For example, marine and rail applications...
By Tom Abrams, CFA | ESG
The information contained in this article is not investment advice. FactSet does not endorse or recommend any investments and assumes no liability for any consequence relating directly or indirectly to any action or inaction taken based on the information contained in this article.