Featured Image

Firing Up Carbon Capture at Power Plants

Energy

By Joseph Warner  |  June 21, 2021

Approximately 107 gigawatts (GW) of coal-fired capacity have been retired over the last 10 years, and an additional 72 GW is expected to retire over the next decade. While economics is the primary force driving these plants to retirement, recent attention on greenhouse gas emissions for power generation has brought additional scrutiny to their carbon footprints. Back in April, BTU Analytics examined coal-fired power plant emissions for the largest operational coal plants across the U.S. Lower 48 states. Here we explore utility-scale carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) at power plants. 

emissions-intensity-for-coal-fired-generators-across-the-us-l48

The chart above shows the 2020 average daily carbon emissions intensity for coal (red line) and gas-fired generation by vintage across the U.S. Lower 48. While coal plants generally produce a higher level of emissions per megawatt hour (MWh), advances in technology for natural-gas-fired units have proliferated in recent years. New combined cycle plants and more efficient turbine designs reduced heat rates and emissions intensity for newer gas plants. 

Results of the Petra Nova CCS Project 

To demonstrate the feasibility of utility-scale CCS technology at an operational coal plant, the U.S. Department of Energy, in partnership with NRG Energy, developed a carbon capture and sequestration project at the WA Parish Generating Station near Houston. The Petra Nova CCS project was designed to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from a portion of the exhaust gases from the plant’s coal-fired Unit No. 8. As a result, total emissions intensity fell from 0.93 metric tons of CO2 per MWh to 0.68 tons/MWh after the project entered commercial service in January 2017. 

despite-diverting-only-37percent-of-flue-gases-from-coal-fired-unit-8-at-wa-parish-generating-station

After extraction from the exhaust stream, the gaseous CO2 was compressed and piped for use in enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Operations at Petra Nova were halted in May 2020 when the COVID-19-related collapse in crude prices made ongoing EOR operations uneconomical. 

Regulatory Incentives Spark Power-Related CCS Projects 

Regulatory incentives for project development continue to evolve, and several power-related CCS projects have been proposed and are at various stages of development, as shown in the table below. Capital costs for such projects continue to remain significant but opportunities for enhanced oil extraction and expanded tax incentives are driving increased interest. Despite the challenges, Petra Nova faced near the end of its demonstration period, the project, currently the largest of its kind in the world, provides evidence that utility-scale carbon capture retrofits of existing power plants are technically feasible. 

numerous-power-oriented-carbon-capture-use-and-storage-facilities-have-been-proposed

While the CCS industry remains nascent, a growing focus on climate may provide support for further development. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 expanded and extended the IRC §45Q tax credit for geological sequestration of carbon oxides and in January 2021, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued final regulations for claiming these credits. President Biden’s Climate Plan promises to accelerate the development and deployment of CCS projects by increasing federal investment and enhancing tax incentives. 

Conclusion 

For a closer look at the emissions intensity of existing power plants, BTU Analytics’ Power View provides a comprehensive emissions dataset capable of visualizing CO2, NOX, and SO2 emissions from U.S. thermal generation plants.

This article was originally published on the BTU Analytics website. 

This blog post is for informational purposes only. The information contained in this blog post is not legal, tax, or investment advice. FactSet does not endorse or recommend any investments and assumes no liability for any consequence relating directly or indirectly to any action or inaction taken based on the information contained in this article. 

BTU oil and gas data

Joseph Warner

Energy Analyst

Mr. Joseph Warner is an Energy Analyst at FactSet. In this role, he focuses primarily on power market data and analysis. Prior, he worked on income tax compliance and consulting for private equity-backed upstream oil and gas entities at Moss Adams. Mr. Warner earned a B.S. in Accounting and Financial Management with a minor in Economics from the University of Colorado Denver.

Comments

The information contained in this article is not investment advice. FactSet does not endorse or recommend any investments and assumes no liability for any consequence relating directly or indirectly to any action or inaction taken based on the information contained in this article.