Featured Image

From Small Things: North American Venture Capital Compared to the Russell 3000

Companies and Markets

By Edward McCormick  |  August 2, 2022

Last September, we did a study examining buyouts vs. the Russell 3000 in the context of the economic volatility of 2020. This month, we’re revisiting this idea applied to a different section of the private markets: venture capital (VC). Given that the present economic shakeup may have significant effects on the tech leaders of the 2010s, we thought it prescient to look at how the future innovators have been performing compared to the public markets. Using Cobalt’s in-house PME (Public Market Equivalent) calculation, we compared the two indexes over the past 20 years to see what factors may inform performance.

cobalt-pme-north-american-venture-capital-irr-vs-russell-3000

Key Takeaways:

  • Our last chart emphasized how buyouts could often take advantage of weaknesses in the public markets. By contrast, we see the unique issues suffered by the venture capital market—the market was heavily impacted by recessionary events, even compared to public market counterparts. While public markets do stall out during recessionary events, there appears to be a sharp decline in venture performance for funds raised around these periods, likely due to a pullback in investments and demand leaving many of these fledgling companies out to hang.
  • In the second half of the chart, we see another trend at work. While the dot-com bubble clearly impaired the venture capital market for a long time, venture quickly rebounded from the global financial crisis and accelerated far quicker than the public markets. While the “everything rally” of the last 10 years raised all ships, venture capital seems to have been especially productive during this time. This is likely due to its positioning allowing for far greater growth than more established markets.

Looking Forward:

  • Having flirted with two recessions in the past three years, there is much speculation on the direction of financial markets. The 2020 recession proved remarkably short-lived, and the present turmoil continues to teeter on the fringes. Venture capital is not at the heart of the drawdown so we can extrapolate that while the venture market may suffer acute setbacks from investor jitters and denominator effects, overall interest will remain strong and could likely bounce back faster than public markets.
  • Given that many of the largest drawdowns in the latest downturn have been in the big tech sector, there may be even greater opportunity for innovative venture-backed companies to rebound and feast on the lost market confidence in the former innovators of Big Tech.

This blog post is for informational purposes only. The information contained in this blog post is not legal, tax, or investment advice. FactSet does not endorse or recommend any investments and assumes no liability for any consequence relating directly or indirectly to any action or inaction taken based on the information contained in this article.

solving_the_private_market_data_challenge

Edward McCormick

Associate Content Specialist, Cobalt, a FactSet Company

Mr. Edward McCormick is an Associate Content Specialist at Cobalt, a FactSet Company. In this role, he oversees Cobalt Market Data, working to continually improve the timeliness, accuracy, and scope of the data set to better create fund and market level data visualizations. Mr. McCormick earned a bachelor’s degree in Mathematics and Economics from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Comments

The information contained in this article is not investment advice. FactSet does not endorse or recommend any investments and assumes no liability for any consequence relating directly or indirectly to any action or inaction taken based on the information contained in this article.