Featured Image

How Much Do Government Contracts Contribute to Defense Suppliers’ Revenue Share?

Companies and Markets

By Ivo Kolchev  |  December 8, 2022

To assess the financial health of defense sector companies, it’s essential to track government contract awards. This is especially true amid the possibility of a recession. Government contracts could prove to be a lifeline to companies if their commercial businesses take a hit.

01-figure-1-contract-awards-by-the-US-department-of-defense-2018-q3-2022

This article reviews the latest quarterly and annual results across the four largest defense suppliers in the U.S.: Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon Technologies, and Booz Allen Hamilton. We also highlight the significance of government procurement for their revenue, using government contracts data by TenderAlpha.com, also available through the TenderAlpha Global Defense and Military Contracting News Feed.

Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) 2022 Q3 results overview

Lockheed Martin reported percentages of Q3 2022 net sales results across four key segments:

  • Aeronautics: 42.7%
  • Missiles and Fire Control: 17.1%
  • Rotary and Mission Systems: 22.8%
  • Space: 17.4%
    02-figure-2-lockheed-martin-2022-q3-net-sales-breakdown

Lockheed reported a 3.5% rise in sales year-over-year, with strong free cash flow generation at $2.7 billion (full-year guidance unchanged at $6 billion). On the other hand, operating margins were marginally down, declining to 11.2% from 11.5% in the prior year quarter. Overall, operating profit was flat Y/Y.

The company’s backlog was up $5.1 billion to $139.7 billion (Q2 $134.6 billion), with 55% expected to be realized over the next 24 months.

Looking ahead, LMT kept its 2022 outlook largely intact, only doubling the amount allotted to share repurchases to $8 billion ($4 billion in a debt-funded buyback to be executed in Q4 2022).

Turning to 2023, the company estimates flat sales compared to the 2022 outlook, citing supply chain challenges. On a positive note, it remains convinced of its ability to generate free cash flow.

If free cash flow grows by mid-single digits annually over the next three years, it may reach $7 billion. In that scenario, the 2025 free cash flow yield against the current market cap of $126 billion would be around 5.5%. Coupled with a 3% U.S. economy growth rate (LMT currently sees 2024 growth resuming at a low-single digit level, with potential upside), it could boost the post-2025 expected return to over 8%.

Because Lockheed Martin has no tangible stockholders’ equity after accounting for intangibles and liabilities, the company’s current valuation is based entirely on its capacity to generate earnings. 

Government revenue share

Among government-dependent companies, few match the definition as closely as Lockheed Martin. Per the company’s 2021 annual report:

“In 2021, 71% of our $67.0 billion in net sales were from the U.S. Government, either as a prime contractor or as a subcontractor (including 62% from the Department of Defense (DoD)), 28% were from international customers (including foreign military sales (FMS) contracted through the U.S. Government) and 1% were from U.S. commercial and other customers.”

Boeing (NYSE: BA) 2022 Q3 results overview

Boeing reported the percentages of Q3 2022 net sales results across three main divisions:

  • Commercial Airplanes (BCA): 39.2%
  • Defense, Space & Security (BDS): 33.2%
  • Global Services (BGS): 27.8%

03-figure-3-boeing-revenue-breakdown

Q3 was a mixed quarter for Boeing.

  • On one hand, it generated stellar free cash flow at $2.9 billion and sees Q4 cash generation at an equally impressive $2.5 billion. In addition, Boeing forecasts 2023 free cash flow at $3-5 billion.
  • On the other hand, charges on fixed-price defense contracts led to a $3.1 billion loss in the quarter. Strong cash flow was helped by a $1.5 billion tax refund that is not expected to recur next year.

BA delivered nine of its 787 Dreamliner planes and has 115 jets remaining in inventory. The company also kept its forecast for a total of $2 billion in abnormal costs relating to the 787 program, to be incurred mostly by the end of 2023.

Backlog in the BDS division was $54.7 billion (-6.8% YTD) out of a total company backlog of $381.3 billion (+1% YTD).

According to company discussions during its 2022 Investor Day, the main drag going into 2023 will continue to be BDS. Around $0.75 billion in negative operating cash flow is expected to be offset by $3 billion of estimated inflows in each of the BGS and BCA divisions.

The big announcement for Boeing was certainly its $10 billion 2025-2026 free cash flow aspiration, which is very attractive relative to its current circa $95 billion market capitalization. We expect 2023-2025 cash flows to go towards fixing the balance sheet, with dividends contingent on a successful turnaround in 2026.

 

04-figure-04-boeing-medium-term-financial-targets

The company's 2025-2026 revenue target of $100 billion is in line with the $101 billion achieved in 2018. The new 10% operating margin aspiration is slightly below the 11.9% and 11% achieved in 2018 and 2017, respectively. 

Government revenue share

The Boeing Defense, Space & Security segment’s primary customer is the U.S. Department of Defense. Revenues from the U.S. DoD, including foreign military sales through the U.S. government, accounted for approximately 84% of its 2021 revenues, according to the Boeing 2021 annual report.

Government spending is also important for the Global Services segment, with 40% of 2021 revenue coming from the U.S. government. Overall, 49% of Boeing’s 2021 revenues were earned pursuant to U.S. government contracts.

Raytheon (NYSE: RTX) 2022 Q3 results overview

Raytheon reported percentages of Q3 net sales results across four main segments:

  • Collins Aerospace Systems: 28.7%
  • Pratt & Whitney: 30.3%
  • Raytheon Intelligence & Space (RIS): 20.4%
  • Raytheon Missiles & Defense (RMD): 20.7%

05-figure-5-raytheon-2022-q3-sales-breakdown

Collins Aerospace Systems saw organic sales growth of 13% Y/Y on the back of recovering commercial air traffic, partially offset by weakness in military sales.

Pratt & Whitney reported the highest organic revenue growth in the quarter at 15% Y/Y, fueled by higher commercial orders.

Conversely, results at the RIS and RMD segments were muted. Organic sales growth was -3% for RIS and -5% for RMD. Backlog at both divisions improved, up $2 billion to $32 billion at RMD and up $1 billion to $17 billion at RIS.

Raytheon cut its full-year 2022 forecast in terms of sales (-1.6%), organic growth (-1.5%), and free cash flow (-33%), with free cash flow taking a hit on changes to capitalization of R&D expenses.

 

06-figure-6-raytheon-2022-forecast

It’s expected that growth will moderate going into 2023 on the back of a more gradual recovery in air traffic, offset by a pick-up in government defense spending as won contracts translate into actual sales. The company also singled out a negative $0.4 per share impact on EPS from pensions next year.

Government revenue share

As per Raytheon’s 2021 annual report, U.S. government sales made up 48% of total sales. Adding 9% in foreign military sales through the U.S. government and 8% in direct foreign government commercial sales, total government exposure in 2021 was 65% of total sales.

07-figure-7-raytheon-sales-breakdown-2019-2021

Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE: BAH) 2023 Q2 results overview

Booz Allen Hamilton’s financial year starts in April, and the company reported the percentages of Q2 2022 net sales results across three main customer segments:

  • Defense Clients: 44%
  • Intelligence Clients: 19%
  • Civil Clients: 34%

08-figure-8-booz-allen-hamilton-revenue-breakdown-q2-2023

BAH achieved 9.2% revenue growth for the quarter, driven by the Civil Clients segment. The company remains committed to M&A activity to help it reach an adjusted EBITDA target of $1.2 billion - $1.3 billion in fiscal 2025.

Turning to the backlog, BAH saw growth of 9.8% Y/Y to $31.8 billion—a record amount for the firm.

The company slightly increased its expectations for fiscal year 2023. Revenue growth is forecasted between 8% - 10%, inclusive of 1 - 2% inorganic contributions. Operating cash flow of $875m - $950m is forecasted.

Government revenue share

Booz Allen Hamilton relied on U.S. government contracts for 97% of its fiscal 2022 revenue, comparable to Lockheed Martin’s 99% government contract exposure.

Defense sector peer analysis

The defense sector has had lackluster growth in the previous decade. Against the backdrop of a looming recession and rising interest rates to stem inflation:

  • Lockheed Martin and Booz Allen Hamilton could be in better positions to weather economic headwinds given their high proportion of government spending as a percentage of their revenues.
  • Boeing is most exposed to commercial developments in the aviation sector.
  • Raytheon could benefit should the air traffic recovery continue.

09-figure-9-defense-suppliers-government-sales-share-out-of-total-sales-2021

As shown on Figure 9, all four companies rely heavily on government sales.

  • For Booz Allen Hamilton, the U.S. government contributes as much as 97% of the company’s sales.
  • For defense heavyweight Lockheed Martin, 2021 revenues from global government sales were 99%, with 71% coming from sales to the U.S. government alone.
  • Boeing and Raytheon also generated much of their sales in 2021 from U.S. government contracts: 49% for Boeing and 48% for Raytheon.

In conclusion, we again posit that monitoring the public procurement activity of major defense sector firms is worthwhile due to their well-documented dependence on government contracting. This holds particularly true in light of the relationship between government receivables and stock movement, as we discussed in a previous FactSet Insight article, Government Receivables as a Stock Market Signal.

 

This blog post has been written by a third-party contributor and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of FactSet. The information contained in this blog post is not legal, tax, or investment advice. FactSet does not endorse or recommend any investments and assumes no liability for any consequence relating directly or indirectly to any action or inaction taken based on the information contained in this article.

Subscribe to FactSet Insight

Ivo Kolchev

Data Analyst

Mr. Ivo Kolchev is a data analyst serving clients in the asset management industry. Previously, he worked at the Bulgarian Stock Exchange cash market operations desk as an analyst/portfolio manager focusing on Western Europe. Mr. Kolchev earned a Master’s in Finance from the University of National and World Economy and has passed Level 3 of the CFA exam. He is a regular contributor to the TenderAlpha.com blog and seekingalpha.com.

Comments

The information contained in this article is not investment advice. FactSet does not endorse or recommend any investments and assumes no liability for any consequence relating directly or indirectly to any action or inaction taken based on the information contained in this article.