Featured Image

Solar Resource Within Energy Communities

Energy

By Elisabeth Baroni  |  October 26, 2022

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the subsequent energy communities it creates stand to accelerate the buildout of renewable generation across the US. Earlier this month, BTU Analytics began identifying energy communities based on the criteria laid out in the IRA. First, BTU highlighted energy communities created by retired and retiring coal generators. We then put together a more comprehensive view of energy communities based on coal mine closures, brownfields, and employment data. In this Energy Market Insight, we will build off that work and take a deeper look at the solar resource potential within energy communities and what this could mean for development in these areas.

The map below shows the annual average solar capacity factor within the previously identified energy communities. Note this map, and the ones that follow, do not include brownfield site locations due to the uncertainty around their geographic boundaries.

solar-capacity-map

It’s not surprising to see the most solar-rich areas are in the West and Desert Southwest areas of the United States, while lower capacity factors reside in Northeast Appalachia. Energy communities in the Southeast fall close to the average for all energy communities, which is 17.6%.

The Southwest has clearly been one of the more desirable areas for development. In fact, the Southwest accounts for 44% (18.6 GW) of operational and currently planned solar projects within energy communities, as shown in the map below.

operational-and-planned-capacity-in-energy-communities

Although there are more projects in ERCOT and the Southwest, there are areas in the West that have little to no planned or operational projects as it stands today. The following graphics take a closer look into energy community census tracts with some of the highest expected capacity factors. The top chart shows the energy communities with the highest expected capacity factors that have solar projects either already operational or planned within their boundaries. The largest of these tracts is a 4.5-million-acre tract in San Bernadino, California.

energy-community-efficiency

The bottom chart above shows similarly solar-rich tracts; however, these tracts have had no development, and none is currently planned. Why are there resource-rich areas where no development is occurring? There could be many reasons for this, such as alternative land uses (military bases), challenges with local regulations, or limited access to transmission. While the IRA will not allow developers to overcome all these challenges, we expect the increased incentives in the IRA will allow developers to look to slightly less economic areas outside of core resource acreage.

The IRA is already changing the US’ power landscape. While additive projects directly tied to incentives in the IRA are still a couple of years out, proposed projects are already on the rise. However, it is not all clear skies ahead. The US has many challenges facing it as its energy transition continues. We’ll continue to explore these challenges, such as tightening resource adequacy and increasing transmission congestion, in coming Energy Market Insights.

For a more in-depth look at the renewable generation market and capacity analysis of existing and planned projects, request a sample of BTU’s Power View.

 

BTU Analytics is a FactSet Company. This article was originally published on the BTU Analytics website.

This blog post is for informational purposes only. The information contained in this blog post is not legal, tax, or investment advice. FactSet does not endorse or recommend any investments and assumes no liability for any consequence relating directly or indirectly to any action or inaction taken based on the information contained in this article.

 

New call-to-action

Elisabeth Baroni

Power Analyst
Ms. Elisabeth Baroni is a Power Analyst at BTU Analytics, a FactSet company, with a primary focus on power market analysis. Elisabeth holds a B.S. in geosciences from the University of Tulsa.

Comments

The information contained in this article is not investment advice. FactSet does not endorse or recommend any investments and assumes no liability for any consequence relating directly or indirectly to any action or inaction taken based on the information contained in this article.