Featured Image

The Blueprint for Methane Emissions Reduction: Colorado


By Matthew Hagerty  |  February 2, 2022

As the oil and gas industry continues to focus on emissions reduction, multiple states are helping speed up those cuts through legislation. New Mexico has announced ambitious plans to reach net-zero emissions by 2050, but Colorado already has some of the strictest regulations on oil and gas operations.

In fact, Colorado’s grip is tightening. Following the adoption of Senate Bill 181 in 2019, the state announced its greenhouse gas (GHG) Pollution Reduction Roadmap in 2020, which targets a 26% reduction in total GHG pollution from 2005 levels by 2025, a 50% reduction by 2030, and a 90% reduction by 2050. Achieving this goal will require significant action outside of oil and gas production, but here we will focus on one of the February 2021 regulatory changes to significantly reduce emissions from oil and gas production: emissions reduction from natural-gas-driven pneumatic devices.

Emissions in the DJ Basin

Oil and gas production expanded in the DJ Basin throughout the decade leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic and with it came a rise in emissions from oil and gas producers. As shown in the chart below, upstream emissions from five of the largest publicly traded producers in the region (Chevron, Civitas, EOG, Occidental, and PDC) rose by 88% from 2011 to 2019, according to EPA FLIGHT data.

However, this came with a meteoric rise in oil and gas production from those producers, meaning that emissions intensity, expressed in metric of CO2 equivalent per thousand barrels of oil equivalent in the chart below, actually fell by 67% over this timeframe. While much of this reduction in equivalent emissions came from methane, that gas still represents 43% of total emissions in the DJ. Methane has a 100-year global warming potential 28-34 times that of CO2, but is also short-lived compared to CO2, meaning that near-term reductions can have an outsized impact on reaching global warming targets by 2050.


The Importance of Pneumatic Devices

One of the largest methane emissions sources for many producers comes from pneumatic devices. Under that umbrella are pneumatic controllers, which can release methane during the actuation of a valve to maintain pressure, temperature, or liquids levels. Producers are likely targeting emissions reduction from many other sources like drilling rigs, frac crews, and workovers. However, Colorado’s Air Quality Control Commission has designated that all production facilities that were brought online beginning in May 2021 or produce more than 15 boe/d use non-emitting pneumatic controllers by May 2023.

As shown in the chart below, pneumatic devices made up an average 36% of upstream emissions from the producers displayed. While this may seem relatively small compared to combustion equipment emissions, pneumatic devices made up an average 83% of methane emissions for these producers in 2020. This means that eliminating powerful methane emissions in the region could be achieved through cleaner pneumatic device technology.


However, the chart above shows that emissions from pneumatic devices vary significantly from operator to operator, mostly dependent on the types of devices used. EOG, for example, uses only low- or no-bleed pneumatic devices in its mostly Wyoming-based DJ Basin operations. This drives EOG’s methane intensity in the region to a fraction of other public operators in the region. The table below shows the average annual emissions for intermittent bleed vs. low-bleed pneumatic devices in the DJ Basin in 2020. Transitioning to only low-bleed devices, as EOG has done, can reduce total emissions for this segment by nearly 90%.



Many producers have laid out plans to phase out higher-bleed pneumatic devices to reduce emissions in their upstream operations. However, this does not come without cost and will likely take time to implement given the sheer quantity that exists across the various shale basins in the U.S. Regulation in Colorado is helping to speed up this transition, but most other oil-producing states have not passed such legislation. While emissions reduction will require an “all-of-the-above” approach, replacing natural-gas-emitting pneumatic devices can have a huge impact on reducing powerful methane emissions.

BTU Analytics is a FactSet Company. This article was originally published on the BTU Analytics website.

The information contained in this article is not investment advice. FactSet does not endorse or recommend any investments and assumes no liability for any consequence relating directly or indirectly to any action or inaction taken based on the information contained in this article.


Matthew Hagerty

Senior Manager of Energy Markets

Mr. Matt Hagerty is the Senior Manager of Energy Markets for BTU Analytics, a FactSet Company. In this role, he is responsible for leading the oil and gas analysis team, which delivers customized energy-market analysis from the wellhead to the burner tip. He also leads bespoke consulting engagements, with expertise that spans upstream, midstream, breakeven economics, and commodity pricing dynamics for oil and gas markets. Matt holds a B.S. in Finance from Tulane University.


The information contained in this article is not investment advice. FactSet does not endorse or recommend any investments and assumes no liability for any consequence relating directly or indirectly to any action or inaction taken based on the information contained in this article.